As the author of a creative work, you are the one who owns copyright to it in the first instance. There are two exceptions to this rule. The first is if you are an employee and you created the work as part of your job. In that case, your employer is who owns copyright to the work. The second exception is if you created the work as a work for hire. In that case, the individual or company who hired you to create the work owns the copyright to it.
What about when you own the company? Who owns the copyright then?
You are Not Your Company
Many creative professionals operate their businesses through a company, usually an LLC or an S Corp. Individuals who own their own companies are not necessarily employees of that company. If you own a single member LLC, you are a member of the LLC, not an employee. If you own all the shares of an S Corp. you are a shareholder of that company and may not be an employee. In either case, you own the copyright to any work you create and not your company. (NOTE: This may be different in a multimember LLC or an S Corp. with more than one shareholder. It depends on the language in the corporate governing documents.)
In the case of a single member LLC or a wholly-owned S Corp., the bigger question is not who owns copyright to the creative work, but rather who should own it? Does it make more sense to hold the copyrights as an individual or to transfer copyright ownership to your company? This is a strategic decision. You need to look at why you set up your company in the first place and what you plan to do with your copyrights in order to decide how copyright ownership should be held.
Creating Multiple Revenue Streams
Your copyrights have the potential to be income producing assets generating multiple revenue streams. A writer can license print book rights, audio book rights, foreign language rights, English language in foreign territory rights, and option the work for performance or a screenplay—each to a different entity, for example. Visual artists can license their work to fabric manufacturers, or for wallpaper, for calendars, coffee mugs, any number of consumer products for sale by retail chains, or as backdrops to ad campaigns or video productions.
When deciding who owns copyright—whether to keep ownership of your copyrights in your own name or to transfer copyright ownership to your company—you need to assess which option offers greater protection for those income streams.
Click the image to enlarge it.
Assessing the Risk to Decide Who Owns Copyright
When making the decision about whether you or your company should own your copyrights, you need to consider the risks to which you and your company are exposed. In other words, how could you or your company get sued?
Almost all creative professionals—writers (fiction, non-fiction, and memoir), visual artists, filmmakers, musicians, graphic designers—have exposure to claims of infringement by a third party. If you infringe someone else’s creative work, that person is probably going to sue you personally, not your LLC. They may not even know about your LLC and in any event, they think you did the infringing, not your company. Creative professionals can also be sued for defamation, invasion of privacy, or violation of someone's right of publicity. If you signed a contract, you could be liable for breach of contract. Simply put, operating through an LLC will not save you from being sued personally.
Your company could get sued for exactly the same things.
Protect Your Income by Protecting Your Assets
The primary purpose of operating through a business entity is to protect yourself and your personal assets from liability. After all, LLC means limited liability company. If there is a judgment against the LLC (or an S Corp.), the creditor has recourse against the assets of the company. But the creditor can’t get to your personal assets. Copyrights owned by the company could be exposed to claims by the company’s creditors.
On the other hand, if you hold your copyrights as a personal asset, they could be exposed to your personal creditors. For instance, Toni Braxton filed for personal bankruptcy and lost the copyrights to her portfolio of songs.
Your membership interest in the LLC (or your shares in an S Corp.) is a personal asset. But it is a personal asset that comes with another layer of protection. In most states, creditors cannot directly attach the assets of the LLC or an S Corp. to enforce a personal debt. Instead, the creditor can get a charging order which entitles them to the member's distributions from the LLC. This is a state law issue. Some states are more debtor friendly than others; plus, the answer may be different for single member LLCs.
Because in most states creditors cannot directly attach the assets of the LLC or an S Corp. to enforce a personal debt, it is easier to protect the revenue streams generated by your creative work if your copyrights are held by your company. Your personal creditor may get to the revenue itself, but not to the creative work that generates the revenue. Once the debt or judgment is paid, you still own the income generating asset—the copyright.
Tax and Estate Planning Considerations
Recent discussions in the Creative Law Center monthly membership workshops uncovered two reasons why holding your copyrights in an LLC offers greater benefit than holding them individually or in an S Corp.
In this excerpt from the Business Structures for Creatives workshop, Maryland Attorney Dan Gartrell explains the negative tax ramifications of holding your intellectual property assets in an S Corp.
In this excerpt from the Estate Planning for Creatives workshop, Maryland Attorney Cheri Dorsey explains why holding your copyrights in an LLC is beneficial from an estate planning perspective.
How to Assign Copyright to Your Company
Apply for copyright registration on your work and identify yourself as the author and initial claimant. Then make an assignment of copyright to your company in which you "sell, assign, transfer, and set over to [your company] the entire United States, foreign and international right, title, and interest in and to copyrights, copyright registrations or applications pertaining to [the work]." The transfer or assignment document can be filed with the Copyright Office. The transfer is effective even if the document is not filed with the Copyright Office.
You can name your company in the rights and permissions section of the application. You can do this even if you decide not to transfer your copyrights. This manages the expectations of potential licensees—that they are dealing with a company and not an individual.
Copyright Practice Tip
Listing your company as the rights and permissions manager of your copyright helps to manage expectations of potential licensees—that they are dealing with a company and not an individual.
The current term of copyright is the life of the author plus 70 years. If the author is a company, the duration of the copyright is 95 years from publication. With the approach suggested here, the math favors a creator who lives 25 years or more from publication. Depending on your age, your estate will have a longer period of time for controlling and licensing your copyrights with you as the author.
There are a number of considerations that go into deciding who owns copyright to your creative work. This post outlines one way of handling the issue. Add salt and pepper to taste.
Updated: August 25, 2021
Building a Creative Business?
Learn how to protect, monitor, and enforce your rights so you can turn your creative work into revenue. Become a member of the Creative Law Center today.
get the details
- the copyright symbol (©);
- Your name as author and your website's name. It can also be the name of an organization, a business, or a corporate name;
- a current year or year range;
- a statement of ownership (“All Rights Reserved”).
The author immediately owns the copyright in the work and only he or she enjoys certain rights, including the right to reproduce or redistribute the work, or to transfer or license such rights to others. In the case of works made for hire, the employer and not the employee is considered to be the author.
The U.S. Copyright Office maintains records of registered works by author and title, some of which may be searched online. More information can be found in the Copyright Office Circular 22 – How to Investigate the Copyright Status of a Work, or by calling the Copyright Office at (202) 707-9100.
The basic rule of ownership is that the author — the person who creates the work — is the first owner of copyright in that work. Under the Copyright Ordinance, the author of a work differs from one category of works to another.
"No copyright intended." "I do not own the music in this video/rights to this music."
The term of copyright for a particular work depends on several factors, including whether it has been published, and, if so, the date of first publication. As a general rule, for works created after January 1, 1978, copyright protection lasts for the life of the author plus an additional 70 years.
With this investment, it should come as no surprise that employers generally own the intellectual property created by its employees in the course of their employment. However, intellectual property that is created by an employee, other than in the course of employment, is owned by the employee not the employer.
The work will be considered a work for hire and owned by the client of the contractor if it is “a work specially ordered or commissioned for use as a contribution to a collective work, as a part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, as a translation, as a supplementary work, as a compilation, as an ...
You cannot identify a copyright owner
Under copyright law, anonymous and pseudonymous works are still fully protected. Simply because you cannot find the name of the copyright owner does not mean that it is not under copyright. Nevertheless, you are left to ponder whom to ask for permission.
You can perform an online copyright search at the U.S. Copyright Office website for registered works. Note, however, that most copyrighted works are not formally registered and do not show up in the search. Many names may turn up as a result of the search.
Copyright exists automatically in an original work of authorship once it is fixed in a tangible medium, but a copyright owner can take steps to enhance the protections of copyright, the most important of which is registering the work.
Copyright refers to a bundle of exclusive rights vested in the owner of copyright by virtue of Section 14 of the Act. These rights can be exercised only by the owner of copyright or by any other person who is duly licensed in this regard by the owner of copyright.
Copyright works such as text, images, art works, music, sounds, or movies.
Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
Copyright Ownership: Who Owns What? - Copyright Overview by Rich Stim - Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center ›
As a general rule, the copyright in a work is initially owned by the work's creator, but this isn't always the case. What are the exceptions to the rule - Copyright Overview by Rich Stim
As a general rule, the copyright in a work is initially owned by the work’s creator, but this isn’t always the case.. If the work is created by an independent contractor and the independent contractor signs a written agreement stating that the work shall be “made for hire,” the commissioning person or organization owns the copyright only if the work is (1) a part of a larger literary work, such as an article in a magazine or a poem or story in an anthology; (2) part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, such as a screenplay; (3) a translation; (4) a supplementary work such as an afterword, an introduction, chart, editorial note, bibliography, appendix or index; (5) a compilation; (6) an instructional text; (7) a test or answer material for a test; or (8) an atlas.. When two or more authors prepare a work with the intent to combine their contributions into inseparable or interdependent parts, the work is considered joint work and the authors are considered joint copyright owners.. Copyright Office considers joint copyright owners to have an equal right to register and enforce the copyright.. Unless the joint owners make a written agreement to the contrary, each copyright owner has the right to commercially exploit the copyright, provided that the other copyright owners get an equal share of the proceeds.. If at the time of creation, the authors did not intend their works to be part of an inseparable whole, the fact that their works are later put together does not create a joint work.. Copyright grants a number of exclusive rights to copyright owners, including:. reproduction right — the right to make copies of a protected work distribution right — the right to sell or otherwise distribute copies to the public right to create adaptations (called derivative works) — the right to prepare new works based on the protected work, and performance and display rights — the rights to perform a protected work (such as a stage play) or to display a work in public.. This bundle of rights allows a copyright owner to be flexible when deciding how to realize a commercial gain from the underlying work; the owner may sell or license any of the rights.. When a copyright owner wishes to commercially exploit the work covered by the copyright, the owner typically transfers one or more of these rights to the person or entity who will be responsible for getting the work to markets, such as a book or software publisher.. If a copyright owner transfers all of the rights unconditionally (and retains nothing), it is generally termed an “assignment.” When only some of the rights associated with the copyright are transferred, it is known as a “license.” An exclusive license exists when the transferred rights can be exercised only by the owner of the license (the licensee), and no one else — including the person who granted the license (the licensor).. Copyright Office allows buyers of exclusive and non-exclusive copyright rights to record the transfers in the U.S.
Copyright Ownership: Who Owns What? - Copyright Overview by Rich Stim - Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center ›
As a general rule, the copyright in a work is initially owned by the work's creator, but this isn't always the case. What are the exceptions to the rule - Copyright Overview by Rich Stim
If the work is created by an independent contractor and the independent contractor signs a written agreement stating that the work shall be “made for hire,” the commissioning person or organization owns the copyright only if the work is (1) a part of a larger literary work, such as an article in a magazine or a poem or story in an anthology; (2) part of a motion picture or other audiovisual work, such as a screenplay; (3) a translation; (4) a supplementary work such as an afterword, an introduction, chart, editorial note, bibliography, appendix or index; (5) a compilation; (6) an instructional text; (7) a test or answer material for a test; or (8) an atlas.. When two or more authors prepare a work with the intent to combine their contributions into inseparable or interdependent parts, the work is considered joint work and the authors are considered joint copyright owners.. Copyright Office considers joint copyright owners to have an equal right to register and enforce the copyright.. Unless the joint owners make a written agreement to the contrary, each copyright owner has the right to commercially exploit the copyright, provided that the other copyright owners get an equal share of the proceeds.. reproduction right — the right to make copies of a protected work distribution right — the right to sell or otherwise distribute copies to the public right to create adaptations (called derivative works) — the right to prepare new works based on the protected work, and performance and display rights — the rights to perform a protected work (such as a stage play) or to display a work in public.. When a copyright owner wishes to commercially exploit the work covered by the copyright, the owner typically transfers one or more of these rights to the person or entity who will be responsible for getting the work to markets, such as a book or software publisher.. If a copyright owner transfers all of the rights unconditionally (and retains nothing), it is generally termed an “assignment.” When only some of the rights associated with the copyright are transferred, it is known as a “license.” An exclusive license exists when the transferred rights can be exercised only by the owner of the license (the licensee), and no one else — including the person who granted the license (the licensor).
Ownership of copyright works may depend on the circumstances under which the work was created.
When you ask or commission another person or organisation to create a copyright work for you, the first legal owner of copyright is the person or organisation that created the work and not you the commissioner, unless you otherwise agree it in writing.. Prior to 1 August 1989 though, the copyright in photographs, portraits and engravings (and only those types of work) which were created as a result of a commission were owned by the commissioner and NOT the creator.. Where two or more people have created a single work protected by copyright and the contribution of each author is not distinct from that of the other(s), those people may be considered joint owners.. Joint ownership might arise, for example, if a person was commissioned to create a website together with one of the company’s employees.. It is likely that both the person being commissioned and the company would be joint first owners of copyright in the website.. Ownership of copyright can be transferred , so where something is produced that has involved contributions from more than one person, it would be possible for copyright in all the material to be owned by a single person as a result of appropriate transfers.
The answer to that question first depends on whether the person you’re paying to create the work is your employee, or whether you’re paying the person informally to do the work as an “independent contractor.”. The “work for hire” rules only give employers rights to creative work that is made “in the ordinary course of” the employee’s employment.. If the work is created in a manner outside of the scope of the agreed-to job description, then it’s likely that traditional rules apply and the employee himself still owns the work.. For staff writers of television shows, illustrators and designers who work in advertising, and professors who do technical research or work on research papers and books, it’s hard to differentiate the type of work that is made in their job descriptions and what type of work is not.. Because examples like those pose difficulties that have sometimes led to litigation, employers often require these kinds of employees to sign agreements to assign all the rights to the work they create using company time or resources to the company, no matter whether or not they were created in the scope of employment.. If the person you hired is considered an independent contractor, you do not own the copyright to the work created by the contractors unless the contractor signed an agreement explicitly stating that you own it.. An independent contractor is like an employee, but the law treats them differently because the employer doesn’t have much control over how an independent contractor renders his or her services.. This is why it’s standard practice when hiring creative people—no matter if they are employees or independent contractors—to have them sign agreements stating that they will transfer their full copyright in any work they create to the person who is paying them to do the work.
Before you cover that awesome song on the radio, make sure you know who owns the copyrights and, most importantly, secure the permission.
In many cases, you'll need to contact the both the copyright owner of the musical composition and the copyright owner of the specific recording you're using.. Many songwriters have agreements with publishers who either administer licensing or take ownership of the songs, so for many musical compositions, you'll be contacting a publisher .. Copyrights for recordings are often owned or administered by record labels, although in some cases, artists may have retained or regained ownership of their recordings.. For many sound recordings, you'll probably need to contact record labels or artists/managers.. This database mostly includes information for compositions, but in addition to listing the writers and publishers/administrators for each composition, many listings also include the names of performers known to have made recordings of the works.. You can search by title, writers, performers, publishers, work ID, or ISWC.. The ISWC number is used to track when musical compositions are publicly performed so that copyright owners can enjoy performance royalties.. Use "other search options" to get advanced search features such as being able to search for title/composer.. After searching, you can also set search limits to include a specific date range and type of work such as "music" or "sound recording.". Worldcat – Designed to help you find items in libraries near you (including university libraries that may have robust sheet music and recording collections), this database can also help you find out more about performers, record labels, and publishers of music and recordings.. If you're able to find the name of the publisher or record company you need to contact, you should be able to find their address, email, and/or phone number online through a quick Google search.. Publisher contact information can also be found in ASCAP's ACE Database.. Jamie is currently an administrator in the Professional Performance Division at Berklee College of Music.
While it may not seem obvious on the surface, the legal question of who owns a trademark registration is one of the crucial legal decisions made when registering and maintaining a trademark registration. It might seem obvious – “If I am the one who came up
It is essential to understand that trademarks, like any other asset, can be bought, sold, and transferred, and owners of those trademarks have certain property rights in those trademarks.. If Jen and Ryan start a new business, Lightning Barriers LLC, then they would need to transfer ownership of the building from DG Enterprises, LLC to Lightning Barriers LLC before Lightning Barriers LLC could make filings on behalf of the building management or hold itself out as the owner of the building for any purposes.. Ryan and Jen’s form a catering business called “Nuportent Catering LLC” and call their business “Nuportent Catering.” Early on in the business, Nuportent Catering LLC registered the mark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office to establish federal trademark rights.. The consequences for filing a trademark application (or renewing a trademark registration) with the wrong owner can be severe.. If the wrong person files a trademark application, then, at least, it will delay the registration of that trademark application because it will require filing Office Action responses to the USPTO.. A trademark registration gives the owner a number of key advantages – under the law, the owner is presumed to own a protectable trademark and is presumed to be the owner of that trademark.
The creator of any original work, whether it be a song, poem, or painting, usually holds a copyright in that work under the Copyright Act of 1976. A copyright is a legal right that gives the holder a group of exclusive rights over the work and how it is used.
If an employee creates intellectual property in the course of their work for an employer, the employer automatically owns the copyright to that work as part of the employment relationship unless the parties have a contractual agreement specifying otherwise.. For example, a journalist who writes for a newspaper would spend significant time creating new intellectual property in the course of their employment.. When a creator sells the entirety of their copyright (rather than granting limited use) to another party, the buyer becomes the new copyright holder.. It is common for the copyright owner to place some limitations on the exclusive rights they are transferring.. An exclusive copyright license means that the transferred rights can be used only by the party who has purchased the license and no one else, including the copyright holder who granted a license.. This way, the buyer is protected if the original copyright holder tries to later transfer those same rights to another party despite the exclusive nature of the license.. Copyright laws are essential to protecting the work of creators while also allowing them to monetize their creations by transferring their exclusive rights to other parties.. Copyright is the legal rights of the owner of an intellectual property to their original and tangible works .. There are situations where the creator of intellectual property does not actually own the copyright to their creation.. The exception to this is if the creator and the employer have an employment contract stating otherwise, protecting the creator's copyright to the work they produce even if it is for the employer.. If the creators did not intend to create a joint work at the time they created it and their work is later put together, this is instead a collective work with each creator retaining an exclusive copyright to the part they authored.. A copyright holder can transfer some or all of their copyright to other parties.
If you're thinking about registering your trademark you need to decide who the trademark owner should be.
Of course I should be the owner of my trademark!. At iGERENT, we not only provide our clients with information regarding the registration process in specific countries, we also help them define a global trademark strategy, and among the subjects that come up most often is the owner of trademark and who it should be.. Since this information generally involves the applicant’s address, this means that individuals choosing to file applications in their own names must be prepared to see personal information published online.. In the case of an individual, they would be directly and personally liable, while owning the trademark through a company would protect the individual according to the legal status of the company.. While only a few countries require that a trademark is being used in order for it to register (such as in the United States ), in almost every country the trademark has to be used within a certain period after registration.. If, for instance, the trademark is owned by an individual but the products are commercialized by the company this individual owns, invoices will be in the name of the company and are therefore likely to be rejected as proof of use.. Once the local distributor has registered the trademark in their name locally, they are the holders of all the proprietary rights to it in their country, and can use it in ways that the product provider did not intend, as well as transfer its ownership to a third party.. If one is planning to have their products commercialized by a local distributor in a specific country, they are advised to file the local trademark application in their own name, and then grant a license agreement authorizing the local distributors to use the trademark.. Most of the factors to consider in this case are similar to the ones already mentioned, that is to say, control over the trademark, its value as a company asset, and demonstrating use of the mark.
Unless you plan ahead, collaboration with an outside developer can muddy the waters in all sorts of ways.
If Version 2.0 is more Shortcut than GoGetter, then Version 2.0 may be considered more a derivative work of Shortcut than of GoGetter.. Copyright Act provides a set of exclusive legal rights to the owner (or "author") of a copyrightable work (which includes software): 1) the right to reproduce the copyrighted works; 2) the right to prepare "derivative works"; 3) and the right to distribute (sell, license, etc.).. However, when a company's employees create the copyrightable work within the scope of their employment, then the work is considered a "work made for hire.". But there's another key question here: whether GoGetter 2.0 is a derivative work of GoGetter 1.0 or a derivative work of Shortcut.. Among the key rights enjoyed by an author to a copyrighted work is the exclusive right to prepare or license "derivative works" to that original work.. In determining "control," the court considered 1) the skill required; 2) the source of the instrumentalities and tools; 3) the location of the work; 4) the duration of the relationship between the parties; 5) whether the hiring party has the right to assign additional projects to the hired party; 6) the hired party's discretion over when and how long to work; 7) whether the work is part of the regular business of the hiring party; 8) whether the hiring party is in business for himself; 9) the provision of employee benefits; and 10) the tax treatment of the hired party.. In our GoGetter example, if you had purchased Shortcut outright (with a written agreement), or secured the consultant's agreement with regard to his development work on GoGetter 2.0 to disclaim all potential copyright interests and assign such interests to GoGetter -- often termed a "work made for hire" agreement -- then in most circumstances, you would end up as the owner of the code.
Copyright Ownership and Transfers FAQs - Copyright Overview by Rich Stim - Stanford Copyright and Fair Use Center ›
When performing copyright research, you may have questions about copyright rules or terminology. For example, you may uncover a registration indicating - Copyright Overview by Rich Stim
If the work qualifies under one of these two methods, the person paying for the work (the hiring party) is the author and copyright owner.. If you want to use the work, you should seek permission from the employer or hiring party, not the person who created the work.. The person who owns a copyright is sometimes referred to as having “title” to the copyright.. There are two ways to determine if copyright ownership has been transferred: by reviewing the copyright registration certificate issued by the Copyright Office, or by locating an assignment or transfer agreement.. Salinger terminated his transfer to the publisher Little, Brown, and Company and reacquired ownership rights to the story, “A Perfect Day for Bananafish.” The termination notice was filed with the Copyright Office (and located through Internet research).. Ignore Heading – Content A common question is whom to ask for permission if several people jointly own a copyright.. All co-owners must consent to an assignment of the work (a transfer of copyright ownership) or to an exclusive license (an agreement granting rights solely to one person).. The author is either the creator of the work or the person who employs someone to create the work (see work-for-hire rules discussed above).. One reason you may not find a notice is because notice is not required on works first published after March 1, 1989.. In addition, for works published prior to that date, notice is required only on visually perceptible copies—that is, copies that can be seen directly or with the aid of a device such as a film projector.. Copyright Office research may not necessarily help you locate copyright information for these works because they may not be listed separately by title in the records.
This short article explains the key points of copyright law – those which should be familiar to every website operator. Website operators need to know about copyright law because copyright materials are their stock-in-trade, and because dealing in copyright materials gives rise to legal risks. Complaints of copyright infringement involving websites are relatively common; and […]
The article is written from the point of view of English law.. (1) Copyright v other IP rights Copyright must be properly distinguished from other kinds of intellectual property (IP) right: patents, trade marks, rights in designs, database rights, and so on.. (2) Copyright protects “works” Copyright law protects a diversity of “copyright works”.. Website text and code may be protected as literary works; photographs and other website artworks may be protected as artistic works; website music tracks may be protected both as musical works and through sound recording copyright.. (3) The de minimis principle Copyright isn’t concerned with very little things.. It does not protect so-called de minimis works, the classic examples of which are titles (such as The Da Vinci Code ) and newspaper headlines (such as Small earthquake in Chile, not many killed ); nor does copyright prevent “insubstantial copying” from a work which is protected by copyright.. So, if you licence others to use your artwork, but don’t assert the right of paternity, they may use it without crediting you!. In English law, permissions to use copyright works (also known as licences) do NOT need to be in writing.. For instance, when you make a website available to the world, you grant an implied licence to internet users to copy that website for the purpose of viewing it on a web browser.. (9) Acts of infringement Copyright infringement isn’t just about copying.. So, downloading an infringing track for personal use may be copyright infringement, but it isn’t usually a crime.
Things every designer should know about intellectual property & copyright infringement - 99designs ›
Knowing who owns which rights to a design and how it can be used is crucial. When is a parody infringing on copyright? Who owns the rights to sold artwork? Find out exactly where the line between fair use and copyright infringement is.
As a designer, inspiration is all around you.. In the United States, every designer automatically owns the copyright to their work, except for in the work-for-hire situations mentioned above.. If you wish to file a copyright infringement lawsuit, you’ll need to register your copyright first.. For specific legal advice, discuss your situation with a local intellectual property lawyer.. Just like a scholarly critique or a piece of news, you can mention copyrighted works in your published criticism.. Parody .. Holding a piece up to criticism through parody, an exaggerated imitation of the work for comedic or critical purposes, is permitted under the fair use doctrine when the parody is transformative in some way.. That’s the key difference between fair use and copyright infringement.. A derivative work that simply uses copyrighted names, concepts, characters and ideas isn’t a parody, but a work that takes them and twists them in a way that makes the consumer gain a new understanding of the original is indeed parody.. Quality and quantity both matter here—in some cases, even using a small piece of the original work can be deemed too much for the derivative to be fair use, since the small piece is the crux of the original work.. Perhaps there’s an artist out there who really inspires you.. Here’s how it works on the 99designs platform: When a designer completes a project with a client and signs the DTA (Design Transfer Agreement) , it means that the client now owns the design.. In a case of copyright infringement, if a designer sold a copyrighted image to a client, the legal owner of the image will have to take legal action against the client.
Businesses all over the United States hire software developers to create software that offers a competitive advantage or cuts operating costs. Frequently both business owners and software developers enter into these agreements to develop software without addressing the issue of copyright. How does copyright law apply to these kinds of agreements, especially in cases where copyright ownership is not addressed explicitly? Who owns the software?
Frequently both business owners and software developers enter into these agreements to develop software without addressing the issue of copyright.. How does copyright law apply to these kinds of agreements, especially in cases where copyright ownership is not addressed explicitly?. The shop owner is about to sign the first agreement to sell the software when he receives a letter from the software designer stating that the owner has no right to sell the software since the developer, not the shop owner, owns the copyright.. Only at this point do the parties contact their respective lawyers for advice on who owns the copyright.. If the facts establish that the "work for hire" doctrine applies, the person for whom the work was created (in this case the shop owner) would own the copyright.. That appears to be the case here: the shop owner hired the software designer to create a new software program.. Both parties agreed, prior to beginning the work, that the work would be considered a work for hire.. In other words, even if the parties had agreed to designate the software as a work for hire prior to the work beginning, it would likely be invalid because software cannot be designated as work for hire since it does not fall within any of the categories listed above.. The software developer is the copyright owner.. The copyright ownership issue could have been addressed with the assistance of legal counsel in preparing the agreement.. From the shop owner's perspective, the agreement might have read that the software developer assigned his copyright ownership to the shop owner as part of the agreement.
Since time immemorial, the debate between clients and designers has been running rampant over who actually owns the logo design; the client or the logo designer?
“logo designers are not making the practicalities of logo design ownership straightforward for their clients.”. Maybe some designers become overly possessive about their designs and opt not to part ways with their design by not transferring ownership to the client.. Since design is crucial for business and brand , I believe that the logo design should be the property of the client once it has been passed on to him by the designer and the monetary transactions have been settled.. Moreover, regardless of who actually owns the logo design, it is the sole and moral responsibility of a designer to make the subject of ownership/copyright extremely clear to the client.. For me, logo ownership depends on the agreement with the specific client and whether the logo may have been designed for a business, educational facility, nonprofit organization, government agency, product or event.. “The designer retains personal rights to use the completed project and any preliminary designs for the purpose of design competitions, future publications on design, educational purposes and the marketing of the designer’s business.. Basically the designer was hired to design the brand/identity for the client.. Lets say you give the client exclusive rights to use the logo you designed, but you as the designer keep the copyright.. I know of many cases with other designers, and have experienced a few myself over the last 35 years, where a designer is hired to create a logo design and specifically not permitted to even claim the work as their own – and certainly not allowed to show the design in a physical or online portfolio.. With over 300 of my designs having been ripped off in just the last 2.5 years by designers who apparently don’t know when to draw the line between inspiration and imitation , I am often notified of infringements from design peers familiar with my work.. As the client has commissioned the designer to create a logo or corporate image, on payment, the logo and image belong to the client.. I always told my design students in the past that all legal documents related to their creative work should be signed and agreed by both parties, the designer and the client.